What JPMorgan’s First Republic takeover means for the crypto industry

From the editor’s desk

Dear Reader,

In the midst of every crisis lies great opportunity. That’s certainly true in the case of cryptocurrency, the most influential financial innovation of our age, whose very origins are often attributed to the global financial crisis that engulfed banks, economies and livelihoods some 15 years ago. 

Case in point: the series of U.S. bank implosions that have set people on edge amid talk of a full-blown crisis in the industry whose echoes of 2008 are unmistakable. 

The opportunity lies in the way in which First Republic Bank has been snapped up by JPMorgan Chase following an auction that lasted into Sunday night. First Republic is not a crypto-focused bank, but neither is it crypto-averse. That fact won’t have been lost on its new owner, whose chief executive, Jamie Dimon, has been one of crypto’s most vocal critics. Despite Dimon’s dogmatic public pronouncements on cryptocurrencies, his staff has been quietly courting crypto companies that are seeking new friends in the banking industry following the implosions of Signature and Silvergate. 

Given JPMorgan’s increased engagement with the crypto industry, it appears unlikely that First Republic, as a new part of the banking giant’s empire, will depart from its own openness to crypto or that of its new owner.

And although it’s true that the prices of the three biggest cryptocurrencies by market cap fell following the news of First Republic’s collapse, they’re currently trading above or around the levels at which they were changing hands three months ago.

Crypto’s attractiveness as an alternative to equity investment (especially investment in smaller banks) has ticked up amid the recent bank implosions, which have also had the effect of opening up opportunities for big, established finance sector players to engage with the industry. 

All one needs to do is look beyond U.S. shores and see the momentum building in other jurisdictions. From Hong Kong ramping up its plans to regain a place at the top table in Web3 innovation, with a virtual asset service provider policy set to come into effect next month, to Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority providing clear direction, including a clampdown on the embattled Three Arrows Capital founders hoping to do business there. The contrast with what’s taking place in America, where crypto-related firms are still wondering whether they can continue receiving banking services, is dramatic. 

It’ll be interesting to compare the industry’s mood from the Consensus conference in Austin, Texas last week, where I led some key conversations with founders of major protocols sharing a stage (look out for our new 30-minute show, Forkast IQ, which launches this week) with the vibe of where I’m headed next week. 

I’ll be in Dubai and Abu Dhabi to share ideas and host roundtable discussions with industry leaders and officials. I expect the gathering not to be dominated by challenges, but rather by encouragement and opportunity. I’ll report back. 

Until the next time,

Angie Lau,
Founder and Editor-in-Chief
Forkast

Forkast.Insights | What does it mean?

JPMorgan’s rescue of First Republic Bank has prompted mixed reactions across the finance sector. Although it was touted by the White House as depositors having dodged a bullet, others have been less sanguine about the deal. 

Markets, already spooked by uncertainty over further interest rate increases, have slid, with U.S. regional banks taking a big hit as some of their stocks suffered double-digit declines amid lingering questions about their long-term viability. 

Crypto prices reacted similarly negatively, with Bitcoin trading below US$27,700 before recovering to top US$29,000. Bitcoin liquidations also ticked up.

Critics argue that JPMorgan’s acquisition was sweetened thanks to the U.S. government offering indemnity protection for buying the bank. They’re not wrong. Analysts believe the bank was bought with protections in place and that JPMorgan will profit immediately from the sale. 

The bigger question for the crypto industry is whether First Republic’s new owner will stick with its positive stance on crypto. The bank had offered guidance for investing in cryptocurrencies before its collapse. 

JPMorgan meanwhile, has made overtures to crypto firms looking for a secure base in the U.S. market, suggesting that whatever is left of First Republic will remain open to crypto. Historically the crypto industry has relied on smaller banks for its fiat on- and off-ramps. Having America’s biggest bank as the U.S. industry’s main off-ramp would offer a welcome form of respectability against a backdrop of stricter regulatory scrutiny. 

Forkast.Insights | What does it mean?

The NFT marketplace war has mostly been a race to the bottom. Fees have been slashed to zero, royalties scrapped and market-distorting wash trading broadly tolerated, leaving many NFT creators with an even more meager slice of the pie. But the entry of prestige auction house Sotheby’s into the NFT marketplace promises a reversal of these trends. 

Sotheby’s, a hallowed institution in the fine art world better known for selling Picasso paintings and Jeff Koons sculptures, is luring NFT artists with promises of creator royalty fees between 5% and 10% of sale prices. Sotheby’s acknowledged that its decision comes amid a broader discussion on resale royalties in relation to NFTs and the market trend away from it. 

With NFT sales in a new downward spiral since their resurgence in January and February, Sotheby’s presence in this market provides assurances for deep-pocketed buyers. Since its entrance into the NFT space, it has sold US$120 million of NFTs, chalking up a series of records for some of the highest prices fetched for digital artworks. 

Those record-breaking fees came during the NFT boom years of 2021 and 2022, and it remains to be seen whether the 279-year-old auction house can continue to draw moneyed crowds to digital art. However things pan out, for the NFT artists picked by Sotheby’s, the chance to capture more royalties is at least a long-overdue realization of crypto’s early promise to creators.  

Forkast.Insights | What does it mean?

Just a year and a half ago, facing regulatory uncertainty in the aftermath of China’s ban on crypto, digital asset companies were fleeing Hong Kong. Bitget’s crypto exchange license application and plans to staff up operations in Hong Kong is a sign that city’s policy turnaround regarding Web3 is already paying off. As local authorities work to lay the foundations for the sector ― including urging banks to offer services to crypto firms ― Hong Kong seems poised to regain its primacy as a global digital assets hub.

Only a month remains until Hong Kong’s new licensing regime for crypto trading platforms becomes operational, and many crypto firms have shown interest in obtaining such licenses. Experts have warned that there may be a backlog of license applications as demand grows.

Angelina Kwan, chief executive officer of financial services firm Stratford Finance and a former member of Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission, recently told Forkast that the regulator would require that potential licensees use external firms that can help sign off on controls as part of the licensing process.

In this new dawn for crypto in Hong Kong, whose new crypto-friendly policy stance reportedly enjoys Beijing’s support, even Chinese state-owned enterprises are making crypto-related investments in the city. For example, the Hong Kong unit of Chinese insurer China Pacific Insurance last month launched two cryptocurrency funds in partnership with investment firm Waterdrip Capital.

Hong Kong is emblematic of the big difference that regulatory clarity can make in a nascent industry such as crypto. Within a predictable regulatory framework, crypto companies in the territory can now formulate business strategies and do long-term planning. In contrast, crypto companies in the U.S. find themselves increasingly at loggerheads with regulators, and industry pillars like Coinbase are having to go to court to obtain regulatory guidance. Hong Kong’s new legal framework for digital assets may serve as an example of not only what government oversight of the industry can accomplish but also a model of what regulations should be.