Site icon Forkast

Coinbase sues SEC in bid for clarity on crypto rules

Coinbase SEC Pepe memecoin digital yuan

In this issue

  1. Coinbase: Demanding direction
  2. PEPE: Leapfrog effect
  3. e-CNY: Digital payday

From the Editor’s Desk

Dear Reader,

Hello from Austin this week, at Consensus 2023, where significant conversations are taking place. And in the dialogue, news this week that Coinbase is suing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is being cheered by many in the crypto community.

Apart from the reflexive support that the U.S. exchange giant is gaining as an underdog in a scrap with a regulator that’s viewed in crypto circles these days less as part of the solution and more as part of the problem, Coinbase’s demand for what it describes as regulatory clarity expresses a sentiment shared widely in the industry.

The SEC’s recent barrage of lawsuits and other moves against crypto companies has, to many insiders, acquired the characteristics of a punitive crusade rather than a coordinated approach to regulating a young industry that would foster its growth and success.

It’s noteworthy that Coinbase’s appeal for increased regulatory certainty pre-dates the SEC’s recent enforcement onslaught against the sector, harking back to a petition that the company filed nine months ago in which it argued that the U.S. market for digital asset securities was dysfunctional due to the lack of clarity in regulation. Coinbase’s petition asked the SEC to propose and adopt rules for the digital asset industry and ― crucially ― made the point that digital assets being traded in the current environment bore the characteristics of commodities, not securities.

That distinction is a critical one, particularly given that many of the SEC’s recent actions against crypto companies have been predicated on the definition of digital assets as securities. It’s also a pivotal definitional issue on which the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have been unable to agree for years, and on which SEC Chair Gary Gensler memorably flubbed in relation to Ethereum in a congressional hearing just last week.

Coinbase’s demand for clarity deserves to be heard ― if for no other reason than the fact that the SEC has a duty to respond that it appears to have neglected since last July’s petition. And, let’s be honest. It would also be satisfying to see the machinery of justice in action as an energetic young industry gives a curmudgeonly old regulator a taste of its own medicine. 

As the European Parliament approved its Markets in Crypto Assets regulatory framework last week, putting Europe at the forefront of digital asset regulation, it behooves the U.S. to move with more alacrity if it’s to keep up. 

Until the next time,

Angie Lau,
Founder and Editor-in-Chief
Forkast


1. Coinbase pushes back

Coinbase’s demand that the SEC provide regulatory clarity comes amid a persistent debate over whether or not crypto tokens are securities. Image: Leon Neal/Getty Images

Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the U.S., has sued the Securities and Exchange Commission, demanding that the regulator be required by a court to publicly respond to a petition it filed in July 2022 in which it asked for clearer crypto regulation. 

Forkast.Insights | What does it mean?

The SEC’s hard line against cryptocurrencies has ruffled feathers. But those feathers needed ruffling because the crypto industry hasn’t done enough to show regulators that it’s capable of regulating itself. 

A case in point is that Coinbase has been embroiled in a number of legal cases since its 2012 founding. In 2022 alone, it was sued for selling unregistered securities, copyright infringement (on more than one occasion), theft and insider trading

Within the industry, Coinbase likely has done more than most to adhere to the rules, but the SEC is clearly not satisfied. Money laundering, theft and scams involving crypto reached record levels last year, leading to a tougher stance among regulatory officials in Washington. 

The White House sent a letter to Congress earlier this year urging lawmakers to make sure cryptocurrencies would not undermine the stability of the broader financial system, and calling on them to protect investors and hold bad actors accountable. Although the behavior of crypto exchanges is by no means the only reason for that letter, in the decentralized world of crypto, centralized operations such as Coinbase represent an obvious first point of contact. 

Coinbase’s legal case against the SEC is little more than a plea to force the regulator to share its thinking. While it’s uncertain whether a judge will side with the company, it’s certain that crypto’s Wild West days are numbered. 


2. Ribbit-lution

The surge in PEPE coin’s popularity suggests that memecoins retain a hold on certain parts of the crypto world, despite their risks. Image: @pepecoineth/Twitter

PEPE, a memecoin launched on April 16 with no presales, reached a market cap of more than US$99 million within nine days, catapulting memecoins back into the limelight despite the bearish mood that has gripped the cryptocurrency market since late 2021. But after hitting an all-time high last week, PEPE prices have since fallen by more than 40%.

Forkast.Insights | What does it mean?

History doesn’t repeat itself, but it rhymes. U.S. humorist Mark Twain’s adage about the peculiarities of time is a useful lens through which to explore PEPE’s sudden rise.  

The crypto market’s fondness for memecoins ― projects with no discernible value ― has ebbed and flowed amid broader market forces, but often in more volatile ways. Take Dogecoin as an example. During the previous crypto winter in 2018, it lost 88.5% of its value from peak to trough. But during the bull market of 2021, it outperformed nearly everything else by quite some margin. Its market cap was similarly impressive. It hovered around US$20 million at the beginning of 2017, reaching a high of US$85 billion in May 2021.  

The lure of being able to time such booms and busts — and make a lot of money quickly, before your holdings go bust — is part of memecoins’ enduring appeal. PEPE is simply another example of this buzz. But what distinguishes PEPE and memecoins in general from historical rhyme is the novel phenomenon of which they are an expression. 

Memecoins form part of an unusual sub-genre known as financial entertainment. The rise of FinTok on the social media network TikTok and the endless supply of memes about market losses on the sub-Reddit wallstreetbets points to the emergence of a generation of younger investors who see winning and losing as an expression of community. 

“Dogecoin is best thought of as a cultural product, rather than a financial asset,” writes Jason Potts, a professor of economics at Australia’s RMIT University. “The reality is few cryptocurrency users hold it as a serious investment or to use in regular transactions. Instead, to own Dogecoin is to participate in a culture.”

PEPE and the rest of the memecoin fraternity are not rhyming, but writing their own history as they go along. 


3. Payday payoff

Changshu’s decision to pay public sector workers in digital yuan represents another step on the road to fostering the CBDC’s mainstream use in China. Image: Canva

Government employees in Changshu, a city in China’s Jiangsu Province, will receive their salaries in digital yuan from next month as China’s central bank digital currency (CBDC) progresses toward day-to-day use, according to a report by Communist Party mouthpiece People’s Daily.

Forkast.Insights | What does it mean?

Paying salaries in e-CNY may be one of the most efficient ways to distribute China’s new digital currency and promote its use. However, that doesn’t mean the public sector employees who receive it will be able to spend it as they please, as e-CNY payments are not yet widely accepted in everyday life in the country.

Reuters reported this week that a doctor working at a hospital in Suzhou almost always immediately converted her e-CNY salary into traditional yuan because it was difficult to find merchants that accepted the CBDC.

China’s central bank, however, isn’t necessarily in a rush to push mass adoption of the digital yuan, experts told Forkast earlier this year. They suggested that the People’s Bank of China should work even more closely with e-payment giants Alipay and WeChat Pay to create more possibilities for spending e-CNY over time. 

This week, WeChat announced that it had started to support e-CNY payments on its in-app short-video platform and mini-programs, where many influencers and merchants tout their products.

The Chinese tech world is known for cut-throat competition and fast-paced development. Despite Beijing’s worries about Chinese tech companies’ size and power that led to clampdowns on the industry in 2020, the government has realized that it would be to its own benefit to work with tech giants when it comes to popularizing the e-CNY.

Although the digital yuan is still far from attaining mass adoption, China is at the forefront of CBDC development for an economy of its size. In the meanwhile, the U.S. is still debating whether to pursue a CBDC amid persistent concerns about privacy, and the House Financial Services Committee last week discussed a draft bill that would direct the Federal Reserve Board to study the impact of a digital dollar. 

It likely will only be a matter of time before China successfully achieves widespread adoption of e-CNY domestically. The question that remains is, how soon will it be when China’s trading partners will be expected to accept the e-CNY for settlement in lieu of the U.S. dollar? 

Exit mobile version